• How to inquire about an act of vandalism beyond the sociology of art and the theories of artistic reception without excluding these?
• What are the other sources of information, further than archives and individuals? How is the memory contained in the matter? What is the new materialism of dust[1] and which methodologies does one need for mobilizing it?
• How to escape the archival paradigm as a chronological accumulation in order to generate multivocal narrations that would contain different perspectives (and voices) of what happened, including those related to the materiality of the masterpiece itself?
• How to renounce the exhibiting values of text (elucidating, explaining) in order to use demonstrative and linking values that are chrono-materially dialectical alongside with the result of the research?

–

[1] I refer to the article of Jussi Parikka, 2012. ‘New Materialism of Dust’. Artnodes, (12), p. None. DOI: http://doi.org/10.7238/a.v0i12.1716